German enterprises’ profitability and financing in 2023 during the period of monetary policy tightening Monthly Report – December 2024
Published on 12/16/2024
German enterprises’ profitability and financing in 2023 during the period of monetary policy tightening Monthly Report – December 2024
Although the German economy was virtually stagnant, the profitability of non-financial corporations improved in 2023, with their pre-tax profit margin rising significantly to 5.3 % from 4.2 % in the previous year. This was mainly due to lower materials costs: in terms of volume, the fall in the prices for energy and intermediate inputs was greater than the rise in personnel expenses and interest costs. This was particularly true for energy companies, which benefited considerably from lower energy prices. On the income side, revenues rose only slightly in an environment of continued high inflation. Interest income and income from other long-term equity investments were the major contributors to profit margins, with the latter factor playing a particularly important role in transport equipment. Yet even without the one-off developments in the energy company and transport equipment sectors, the profit margin of non-financial enterprises remained high. With regard to their profitability, German enterprises seem to have coped well with the stagnation of economic activity in 2023.
Starting from a low level, corporate insolvencies rose sharply in 2023, mainly owing to the poor economic situation, catch-up and normalisation effects following the pandemic, and higher financing costs. Contact-intensive areas such as retail and the hotel and restaurant sector were particularly hard hit, as were sectors that tend to be more sensitive to interest rates, such as construction and real estate. The ICT sector and business-related services, which experienced exceptionally high demand during the pandemic, also contributed significantly to the increase.
In 2023, monetary policy tightening also pushed up the average interest rate on bank loans to non-financial corporations in Germany. Estimates using firm-level data from the Bundesbank show that contractionary monetary policy shocks already tend to dampen investment by non-financial corporations in Germany in the same year. The strongest impact is estimated to occur after about two years. Consistent with this, the interest rate reversal had left only moderate traces in enterprises’ financial statements by the end of 2023.
Despite the weak state of the economy, enterprises remained well positioned in 2023 in terms of their liquidity and stability. The equity ratio rose again in 2023, having fallen over the previous three years, but remains below its pre-pandemic level. Enterprises’ liquidity positions also remained favourable in 2023 and liquidity needs trended lower. The good profitability, solvency and liquidity position of enterprises in the non-financial corporate sector as a whole largely reflects developments across sectors.
The ongoing economic weakness is likely to continue to weigh on enterprises’ business activity and thus their sales growth in 2024. At the same time, the pressure on costs is expected to remain high due to persistently high financing and energy costs, as well as the sharp rise in wages. Cost factors are placing a particular strain on the competitive position of the industrial sector. On balance, this is likely to have a negative impact on profitability in some parts of the corporate sector in 2024.
1 Underlying trends
The German economy stagnated in 2023, while the tightening of monetary policy increased financing costs. Real GDP declined by a seasonally-adjusted 0.1 % compared to the previous year, due partly to the structural growth problems of the German economy and partly to weak domestic and foreign demand. Production remained well below medium-term aggregate production capacities. The rise in interest rates and high construction costs dampened investment demand. Gross fixed capital formation, especially in construction, fell. Private consumption also weakened after being a major driver of the economy in the two previous years. High inflation per se depressed real incomes and consumers’ willingness to spend. Exports virtually stagnated in the face of weak global demand and a less favourable competitive environment, due in part to the appreciation of the euro. On the production side, the significant decline in the prices of imported intermediate inputs and commodities, especially in the energy sector, eased pressure on the cost structure in industry. Nevertheless, input prices remained above 2021 levels. The stable labour market helped employees to largely achieve their demands for real wage adjustments, increasing enterprises’ personnel expenses. On the whole, therefore, the business environment remained difficult despite the fall in energy prices compared to the previous year.
Based on the annual financial statements available to date, pre-tax profit margins rose in 2023, from 4.2 % in the previous year to 5.3 %. 1 This was only just below the record figure from 2007. This positive development was due both to cost-side relief and to favourable developments on the income side. Material costs fell significantly due to the decline in prices of intermediate inputs, especially of energy. Despite a slight increase in interest costs, total costs fell significantly because lower material costs more than offset the higher personnel expenses. On the income side, revenues increased slightly. In view of the continuing strong increases in selling prices, the price-adjusted revenues of enterprises are likely to have fallen, however. Nevertheless, interest income and income from other long-term equity investments contributed to an improvement in the earnings of enterprises compared to the previous year.
Developments in the automotive industry and amongst energy companies contributed to the increase in gross profit margins across the corporate sector. In contrast to 2022 and most likely also 2024, car sales were comparatively brisk in 2023. 2 In addition, the automotive industry realised significant income from participating interests, mainly from abroad, possibly with the aim of smoothing fluctuations in profit in view of the annual financial statements. After recording some major losses in the previous year, energy companies reported their highest annual profits since records began in 1997, boosted by significantly lower material costs. The fact that sales declined less in comparison could indicate that price reductions on the purchasing side were not fully passed on to end customers. This would have significantly increased profit margins. 3 Without the contribution of these two sectors, the gross profit margin would have increased by only 0.2 percentage point in 2023. 4 But the gross profit margin in 2023 was high in a long-term comparison even without the contribution of these two sectors. With regard to their profitability, German enterprises seem to have coped well with the stagnation of economic activity in 2023.
2 Development of corporate insolvencies
Corporate insolvencies rose sharply in 2023 year on year. The increase is due to the weak economic environment as well as to catch-up and normalisation effects in the wake of the pandemic. This applies in particular to the contact-intensive sectors of retail and the hotel and restaurant sector, which accounted for almost a third of the increase in corporate insolvencies in 2023. While economic activity in these sectors declined, in some cases significantly, during the coronavirus pandemic, corporate insolvencies in these industries fell sharply. The main factors in this were probably the suspension of the obligation to file for insolvency and extensive government support measures. 5 Despite this development, the share of persistently unprofitable enterprises in Germany did not increase during the pandemic (see the supplementary information entitled “Zombie firms in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic”). Furthermore, by 2023, demand in sectors that had benefited from extremely strong demand during the pandemic is likely to have normalised. This is particularly true of information and communication services and business services, which together contributed slightly over one-fifth of the increase in corporate insolvencies in 2023. Moreover, the rise in corporate insolvencies can be partly attributed to the interest rate reversal in the summer of 2022. Evidence for this can be seen in the sharp increase in insolvencies in interest rate-sensitive segments such as construction, real estate and other real estate-related sectors. Together, they accounted for a little over a quarter of the increase in corporate insolvencies. The manufacturing sector, in contrast, contributed comparatively little.
Supplementary information
Zombie firms in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic
The phenomenon of zombie firms has once again come to the fore in view of weak productivity growth in Germany. In the literature, zombie firms are defined as firms that remain in the market despite having been unprofitable for several years. 1 They can benefit from the fact that banks grant them particularly favourable lending conditions in order to avoid realising losses from their business with them (something known as evergreening). 2 A sufficiently large number of unprofitable firms would impair aggregate productivity growth, as they tie economic resources – be it labour or capital input – inefficiently. The low interest rate environment during the years preceding the pandemic had already fuelled concerns that undercapitalised lenders would continue to finance this type of firm. Earlier Bundesbank analyses did not suggest an elevated share of zombie firms in Germany. 3 During the COVID-19 pandemic, German enterprises were granted extensive government support measures. This includes loans in which the development bank Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau(KfW) assumed a large part of the default risk. In addition, the obligation to file for insolvency was temporarily suspended. These measures were intended to support firms that had suffered large losses in turnover and earnings as a result of the pandemic and the measures taken to contain it and to prevent fundamentally profitable firms from exiting the market. However, previously unprofitable enterprises may also have benefited from the support measures.
Developments in the share of persistently unprofitable firms in Germany can be estimated on the basis of the annual financial statements of non-financial corporations (JANIS) as compiled by the Bundesbank. 4 In the JANIS dataset, these firms include – in line with the literature – any enterprises that have been unable to cover their interest expenses from their operating result for three consecutive years and are older than ten years. 5 In addition, the definition used here allows firms to use additional financial income (including from equity interests in other enterprises) to cover interest expenses. 6 This income is not insignificant for German enterprises.
The results show that the percentage of zombie firms in Germany did not increase during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, their share of sales declined during this period. 7 In contrast to earlier periods of weakness, such as the recession in the early 2000s or the economic and financial crisis of 2008‑09, when the share of persistently unprofitable enterprises in Germany increased, it tended to decline during the pandemic. The fact that this share has dropped since 2020 – despite the pandemic and energy crisis – could be partly attributable to the conditions of the COVID-19 assistance measures. Some of these were linked to firms’ profitability in the preceding years. 8
Further analyses show whether persistently unprofitable firms benefited from particularly favourable financing conditions during the pandemic. This provides evidence of the extent to which these enterprises were kept alive by preferential treatment by banks (evergreening thesis). This also makes it possible to assess whether they benefited excessively from the COVID-19 assistance loans. To this end, financial characteristics of enterprises from the AnaCredit datasets up to 2022 are linked to enterprises’ annual financial statements data. 9 This allows us to analyse whether enterprises that were classified as zombie firms in 2019 were better off in terms of financial characteristics during the pandemic. 10
Between 2019 and 2022, German credit institutions estimated the probability of loan default (PD) for persistently unprofitable firms to be higher than for other firms and demanded an appropriate interest rate premium. In the pre-crisis year of 2019, banks determined that zombie corporate borrowers were on average around 3 percentage points more likely to default on loans than other firms. This largely also applies to the pandemic period. 11 In other words, credit institutions were already aware of the risk of potential payment difficulties for these firms before – but also during – the pandemic. 12 The associated higher interest rate premia reflect this.Even before the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis, these firms had to pay an interest rate premium of around 30 basis points compared with other firms. The estimates suggest that this premium rose somewhat during the COVID-19 crisis – although this increase is in the range of statistical uncertainty. Overall, these results contradict the evergreening thesis and preferential treatment of zombie firms – including during the pandemic.
In addition, the probability of persistently unprofitable firms receiving a COVID-19 assistance loan was lower than for other firms. This is the result of additional estimates which match up with previous findings that these firms did not benefit any more than other enterprises from more favourable financing conditions during the pandemic. 13
The analysis does not provide a comprehensive assessment of support programmes during the pandemic. First, it is based on only a small part of the support measures, namely the COVID-19 assistance loans. By contrast, the expansion of short-time working benefits and other extensive assistance to enterprises, such as direct transfers, say in the form of direct company subsidies for fixed costs, were not included in this analysis. Second, the share of zombie firms is only one of several criteria that should be used to assess the support measures. 14
Looking at the results as a whole, there was no significant rise in persistently unprofitable firms in Germany during the pandemic. On the contrary, credit institutions appear to have been aware of the higher risk of lending to these corporate debtors – measured by PD and the interest rate – before and during the pandemic. These firms did not benefit excessively from the assistance loan programmes launched in the context of the pandemic either. 15 It is therefore unlikely that zombie firms play a prominent role in the German economy’s weak productivity growth which has been observed for some time now.
In the first half of 2024, corporate insolvencies continued to rise sharply compared with the same period a year earlier. Extrapolated to the year, corporate insolvencies are expected to exceed pre-pandemic levels again in 2024 for the first time. Higher financing costs as well as catch-up and normalisation effects in the wake of the pandemic are having an impact this year, too. The fact that the German economy has not yet regained momentum is probably playing a certain role in the continued sharp rise in insolvencies.
3 The impact of monetary policy tightening on business investment and financing
The interest rate reversal in the euro area increased financing costs for German enterprises in 2023. This trend increased the cost of external financing for enterprises and raised debt servicing costs for new liabilities. In principle, this limits the scope for investment. The impact this has ultimately depends on the debt structure and the ability of enterprises to service interest costs or switch to other sources of financing. In addition to the impact on cash flow, an interest rate hike tends to dampen corporate investment by reducing the profitability of investment projects and making alternative investments more attractive, while falling asset prices also lower the collateral base for loans.
Estimates using Bundesbank firm-level data can provide insights into how the interest rate increases affected investment by German firms in the 2023 reporting year. The study is based on extensive firm-level data by the Bundesbank since the 1970s, making it possible to analyse the effects of interest rate cycles over several decades. 6 The local projections method is used to estimate the impact of monetary policy shocks on the investment ratio. 7 The results show that, in the past, contractionary monetary policy shocks significantly dampened investment by non-financial corporations in Germany. For example, in the past an unexpected interest rate increase of 100 basis points reduced the investment ratio of German enterprises by 0.6 percentage point within two years. The effect could generally be seen in the year of the interest rate change and then intensified in subsequent years, before gradually subsiding after four years.
According to a rough calculation based on the estimated results, the latest interest rate hikes totalling 400 basis points between July 2022 and the end of 2023 may have reduced the investment ratio in the corporate sector by up to 2.4 percentage points. 8 This assumes that these interest rate hikes were completely unexpected – which is unlikely to have been the case. Nevertheless, the estimates show that monetary policy tightening is likely to have a significant adverse effect on investment by the German corporate sector.
The results show that interest rate increases had a greater impact on the investment ratio than interest rate cuts. Looking at interest rate hikes separately from interest rate cuts in the estimates, an unexpected interest rate increase of, say, 100 basis points reduced German firms' investment ratio by around 1.3 percentage points on average after one year, 9 while an interest rate cut of the same size only increased the investment ratio by 0.7 percentage point in the short term. 10 This asymmetrical effect is presumably due to the fact that in some cases, higher interest rates can have the same effect as tighter credit restrictions for enterprises with weaker finances. One indicator of an enterprise's financial situation could be its equity base. This is because, according to the estimates, companies with a low equity ratio react more strongly to monetary policy shocks, while financially sounder companies are more resilient. 11 Additional analyses suggest that the asymmetrical effect has diminished over time, possibly because of the significant improvement in the capital base in the corporate sector over the last two decades. This may have reduced sensitivity to interest rate increases.
The interest rate reversal left only moderate traces in the annual financial statements available up to the end of 2023. Changes in interest rates are most likely to be reflected in companies’ interest expenses and income, as well as in their liabilities. Accordingly, interest expenses did increase. The imputed interest rate, which is a measure of enterprises’ actual financing costs, was only 3.6 %, placing it above the previous year’s rate, but still below the level before 2016, with the exception of a one-off increase to 4.1 % in 2018. One reason for the comparatively moderate increase could be the slight rise in the discount rate for pension provisions, which reduced interest expenses somewhat. In previous years, the continuous decline of this rate, which is calculated as an average over the past ten years, had driven up expenses. In addition, many companies appear to have taken measures to limit their interest costs. For example, companies have scaled back long-term interest-bearing bank debt and are increasingly using customer advance payments as a source of financing. Companies also favoured financing with their own funds over using external funds.
In nominal terms, the investment ratio and the gross and net additions to tangible fixed assets continued to rise. This is also true for investments in subcategories such as land and buildings, technical equipment and machinery, and furniture and equipment. However, price effects in particular are likely to play a role here. According to the national accounts, gross fixed capital formation in the economy as a whole and investment in machinery and equipment fell after adjustment for inflation. Moreover, the effects of the interest rate reversal are not expected to be fully felt until two years after the interest rate hike, i.e. in the financial years 2024 and 2025, based on the estimates. It should be noted that interest rates on bank loans to non-financial corporations have fallen slightly again in 2024, which in itself is likely to mitigate the financial burden on companies somewhat.
4 Sales and income
Unsurprisingly, given the challenging economic environment, the performance of non-financial corporations was weak in 2023. Sales in the non-financial corporate sector increased only slightly. The sales trend varied greatly by sector. For example, sales grew strongly in the hotel and restaurant sector (probably due in part to certain pandemic-related catch-up effects), among business service providers, in the motor vehicle trade, construction, manufacture of transport equipment and mechanical engineering. By contrast, energy-intensive industrial sectors such as the wood, paper and printing industry, the chemical and pharmaceutical industry and energy supply saw sales decline. 12 The decrease in sales in the energy-intensive manufacturing sector is probably also related to the fact that energy prices, although falling, were still high. For example, this could have led to parts of production being moved abroad or to a decline in shares of exports due to reduced competitiveness. Lower energy prices led to an immediate decline in sales in the energy supply business. The rise in sales in some parts of the services sector is thought to be mainly due to price effects given the environment of persistently high inflation. By contrast, interest income continued to grow strongly across all sectors as a result of the interest rate reversal. Income from other long-term equity investments rose significantly off the back of developments in the transport equipment and chemical and pharmaceutical industries.
Despite the generally weak performance, corporate profits rose sharply. This was mainly due to the fact that expenses were lower on average. This was because the cost of materials declined, partly as a result of falling prices for intermediate goods, especially energy. However, the drop in the cost of materials was limited to energy supply, energy-intensive manufacturing, and the transportation and storage sector. In the remaining economic sectors, costs merely increased less than in the previous year. In sectors with high sales growth, the cost of materials increased correspondingly. There were further sharp increases (in most sectors) in personnel expenses due to significant wage increases and in interest expenses due to the interest rate reversal. One exception to this is the chemical and pharmaceutical industry, where both cost items fell. 13
From a sectoral perspective, too, profitability remained robust in 2023. Despite falling sales, the profitability of energy-intensive manufacturing industries declined only slightly because of reduced costs. Although gross profit margins fell in the wood, paper and printing industries, for example, they were still above the historical average. In the other energy-intensive industrial sectors, profitability remained close to the long-term average. Across all sectors, the highest increases in gross profit margin were recorded by the manufacture of transport equipment, energy supply and electrical engineering. The sectors in which the increase in profitability was primarily due to growth in income rather than reduced pressure on expenses included – in addition to transport equipment and the rest of the manufacturing sector – the information and communication sector, the mechanical engineering sector and the construction sector 14 .
Table 3.1: Enterprises’ income statement*
Item
2021
2022
2023s
2022
2023s
€ billion
Year-on-year change
%
Income
Sales
7,246.7
8,818.6
8,836.8
21.7
0.2
Change in finished goods1
85.7
111.1
77.8
29.6
− 30.0
Gross revenue
7,332.4
8,929.7
8,914.7
21.8
− 0.2
Interest and similar income
17.7
22.2
55.0
25.0
148.2
Other income2
319.7
336.5
360.7
5.3
7.2
of which:
from other long-term equity investments
61.7
68.8
91.9
11.5
33.7
Total income
7,669.8
9,288.4
9,330.3
21.1
0.5
Expenses
Cost of materials
4,823.8
6,163.6
5,983.1
27.8
− 2.9
Personnel expenses
1,229.0
1,325.6
1,398.1
7.9
5.5
Depreciation
210.8
228.0
225.3
8.1
− 1.2
of tangible fixed assets3
192.8
200.1
206.7
3.8
3.3
Other4
18.0
27.9
18.6
54.9
− 33.3
Interest and similar expenses
63.2
77.6
86.3
22.9
11.2
Operating taxes
4.9
4.9
5.3
0.1
7.5
Other expenses5
969.6
1,118.8
1,162.2
15.4
3.9
Total expenses before taxes on income
7,301.3
8,918.6
8,860.3
22.2
− 0.7
Annual result before taxes on income
368.5
369.8
470.0
0.4
27.1
Taxes on income6
75.0
83.9
81.7
11.9
− 2.6
Annual result
293.5
285.9
388.3
− 2.6
35.8
Memo items:
Cash flow7
616.6
639.9
633.2
3.8
− 1.0
Net interest paid
45.4
55.5
31.3
22.1
− 43.5
as a percentage of sales
in percentage points
Gross income8
34.6
31.4
33.2
− 3.2
1.8
Annual result
4.0
3.2
4.4
− 0.8
1.2
Annual result before taxes on income
5.1
4.2
5.3
− 0.9
1.1
Net interest paid
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.0
− 0.3
* Extrapolated results; differences in the figures due to rounding. 1 Including other own work capitalised. 2 Excluding income from profit transfers (parent company) and loss transfers (subsidiary). 3 Including write-downs of intangible fixed assets. 4 Predominantly writedowns of receivables, securities and other long-term equity investments. 5 Excluding cost of loss transfers (parent company) and profit transfers (subsidiary). 6 In the case of partnerships and sole proprietorships, trade earnings tax only. 7 Annual result, depreciation, and changes in provisions, in the special tax-allowable reserve and in prepaid expenses and deferred income. 8 Gross revenue less cost of materials.
5 Balance sheet developments
The growth in corporate assets weakened in 2023 in view of the more subdued economic situation. Growth in non-financial corporations' total assets was much lower on average than in the two previous years. Enterprises used the additional funds largely for the formation of non-financial assets, while the acquisition of financial assets was weak. The share of financial assets thus decreased, as in the previous year, due mainly to the decline in total receivables. While long-term receivables continued to rise, short-term receivables, which account for a much larger share of the balance sheet, decreased. By contrast, other long-term equity investments rose sharply, as in the two previous years. In 2023, efforts to conserve liquidity were no longer a major factor for most enterprises, as liquid funds in the form of cash and bank deposits were reduced. The liquidity needs of most sectors changed only slightly. The strong increase in non-financial assets in large parts of the corporate sector was due in roughly equal measure to tangible fixed assets and inventories. The increase in tangible fixed assets was higher than in the previous year, while intangible fixed assets barely increased. However, it is not immediately obvious from corporate financial statements that many enterprises are looking into the use of artificial intelligence. This is easier to identify using more granular datasets (see the supplementary information on “The adoption and objectives of artificial intelligence in German firms”). However, the increase in inventories was not as high as in the previous year, partly due to muted price developments and stagnating sales. Moreover, supply chain disruptions were resolved in 2023, which reduced the need for increased inventory.
Supplementary information
The adoption and objectives of artificial intelligence in German firms
The digital transformation has the potential to radically alter business and working life. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) especially could invigorate aggregate productivity growth in Germany, which has long been sluggish. 1 Generative AI is seen as the major technological advance in this regard. Because it can handle complex tasks that were previously considered exclusively executable by humans, it holds the promise of substantial productivity gains. In contrast to earlier technological innovations that automated routine tasks, generative AI is able to create content such as text or images by itself, which could potentially make human work significantly more efficient. 2
A representative online survey of just under 7,000 German firms conducted by the Bundesbank provides detailed insights into the use of digital technologies in 2024 as well as the reasons motivating their adoption. 3 The analysis focuses on four key technologies: predictive and generative AI, cloud computing, infrastructure technologies for integrating work and/or production processes, and robotics. Until now, there has been very little reliable information on the adoption and use of digital technologies in the German corporate sector. 4
In the current early phase of AI adoption, two-fifths of firms are already engaging with the technology. Notably, in the second quarter of 2024, 43 % of the surveyed enterprises were using predictive or generative AI at least experimentally or were planning to introduce it before the end of 2024. 5 Only 3 % were making extensive use of it, which is probably because the technology is so new. Most firms using AI were therefore doing so experimentally (19 %). A slightly smaller number of firms had already taken things a step further and were using it to a limited extent (14 %). A further 8 % do plan to implement it by the end of 2024. The majority of firms are not yet using AI and are not intending to introduce it before the end of 2024. Cloud computing (66 %) and infrastructure technologies (49 %), on the other hand, are more widespread. Robotics (14 %) are deployed chiefly in industrial sectors.
The use of predictive and generative AI varies widely depending on sector and firm size. It is particularly prevalent in sectors characterised by data-driven processes and digital interaction, such as information, communication and finance. By contrast, it figures less frequently in economic sectors where tasks are of a more manual or interactive nature, such as healthcare, hospitality and transport. Large firms are driving the adoption of AI: 78 % of enterprises with turnovers of more than €229 million use AI or are planning to introduce it, compared with just 37 % of firms with turnovers under €1 million. According to an OECD study, high costs, a lack of technical expertise and lower perceived benefit are key barriers for smaller firms. 6 The same pattern is also evident with other digital technologies, such as cloud computing and robotics.
According to the findings, firms primarily use robotics to automate tasks, whilst AI is mainly being used to improve supporting processes. A key objective for both technologies is the optimisation of methods or processes that are already automated (AI: 55 %; robotics: 58 %). The automation of existing activities is particularly important for robotics (58 %), but does also play a significant role for AI (47 %). AI is also important for improving supporting processes such as in the areas of human resources or marketing (53 %), whereas robotics are naturally less applicable in these areas (25 %). Expanding the range of goods and services on offer is a lower-priority objective in the case of both technologies (AI: 36 %; robotics: 29 %).
The effects of generative AI on the labour market and productivity are likely to be very different from those of robotics. While the survey results do not provide direct insights into the productivity or labour market impacts of AI or robotics, they do suggest – in line with the literature – that robotics are predominantly being used to automate manual activities. In contrast, generative AI comprehensively transforms work processes and could significantly boost productivity, especially in supporting functions. Widespread use of generative AI could thus provide positive impetus for aggregate potential growth. Estimates of AI’s effect on productivity are, however, fraught with uncertainty. Empirical studies show a wide range of outcomes, ranging from modest effects to substantial aggregate productivity gains. 7 What is sure, is that improved digital infrastructure and targeted training measures are essential to fully realising the growth potential of this technology.
The capital base of enterprises improved on average in 2023. On the revenue side, most of the additional corporate funds were sourced internally, with a significant share coming from retained earnings. In contrast to equity, liabilities and provisions increased only slightly. The noticeable increase in the equity ratio thus roughly offset the decline from the previous year. The equity ratio rose in almost all sectors.
Liabilities shifted proportionately from long-term to short-term on balance, as in the two previous years. Short-term liabilities rose only slightly on average in 2023. Although advance payments received on account of orders and short-term liabilities to banks increased sharply, the reduction in trade payables and other liabilities had an offsetting effect. At the same time, enterprises reduced their long-term liabilities by decreasing their long-term liabilities to banks. 15 In contrast to the three previous years, provisions also increased only slightly. The rising discount rate resulting from the interest rate reversal may also have provided relief with respect to pension provisions.
Table 3.2: Enterprises’ sources and uses of funds* € billion
Item
2021
2022
2023s
Year-on-year change
2022
2023s
Sources of funds
Capital increase from profits and contributions to the capital
of non-corporations1
93.4
75.3
84.0
-18.1
8.7
Depreciation (total)
210.8
228.0
225.3
17.1
-2.7
Increase in provisions2
112.3
126.0
19.7
13.7
-106.3
Internal funds
416.6
429.3
329.0
12.8
-100.3
Increase in capital of corporations3
70.5
26.0
48.5
-44.5
22.5
Change in liabilities
263.1
404.4
34.9
141.2
-369.5
Short-term
260.5
393.2
40.8
132.7
-352.4
Long-term
2.6
11.2
-5.9
8.5
-17.1
External funds
333.6
430.3
83.4
96.8
-346.9
Total
750.1
859.7
412.4
109.5
-447.2
Use of funds
Increase in tangible fixed assets (gross)
258.9
267.1
285.0
8.2
17.9
Increase in tangible fixed assets (net)4
66.1
67.0
78.3
1.0
11.2
Depreciation of tangible fixed assets
192.8
200.1
206.7
7.2
6.6
Change in inventories
129.9
213.1
57.2
83.2
-155.9
Non-financial asset formation (gross investments)
388.8
480.2
342.1
91.4
-138.1
Change in cash
54.1
24.2
-2.3
-29.9
-26.5
Change in receivables5
223.8
264.6
-13.1
40.8
-277.7
Short-term
227.8
245.5
-32.9
17.6
-278.3
Long-term
-4.0
19.2
19.8
23.2
0.6
Acquisition of securities
8.9
10.1
3.5
1.2
-6.6
Acquisition of other long-term equity investments6
74.6
80.6
82.2
6.0
1.6
Financial asset formation
361.3
379.5
70.3
18.2
-309.2
Total
750.1
859.7
412.4
109.5
-447.2
Memo item:
Internal funds as a percentage of gross investments
107.1
89.4
96.2
.
.
* Extrapolated results; differences in the figures due to rounding. 1 Including “GmbH und Co. KG” and similar legal forms. 2 Including change in the balance of prepaid expenses and deferred income. 3 Increase in nominal capital through the issue of shares and transfers to capital reserves.4 Change in tangible fixed assets (including intangible assets but excluding goodwill). 5 Including unusual write-downs of current assets. 6 Including change in goodwill.
Table 3.3: Enterprises’ balance sheet*
Item
2021
2022
2023s
2022
2023s
€ billion
Year-on-year change
%
Assets
Intangible fixed assets1
81.5
83.3
83.6
2.2
0.4
Tangible fixed assets
1,311.7
1,377.0
1,454.9
5.0
5.7
Inventories
930.2
1,143.3
1,200.4
22.9
5.0
Non-financial assets
2,323.4
2,603.5
2,739.0
12.1
5.2
Cash
497.3
521.5
519.2
4.9
− 0.4
Receivables
1,854.6
2,114.8
2,099.2
14.0
− 0.7
of which:
Trade receivables
518.7
575.4
588.3
10.9
2.3
Receivables from affiliated companies
1,071.5
1,233.9
1,227.8
15.2
− 0.5
Securities
115.7
125.8
129.3
8.7
2.7
Other long-term equity investments2
1,014.3
1,071.4
1,137.6
5.6
6.2
Prepaid expenses
38.9
39.5
42.5
1.5
7.8
Financial assets
3,520.8
3,873.0
3,927.7
10.0
1.4
Total assets3
5,844.2
6,476.5
6,666.7
10.8
2.9
Capital
Equity3
1,770.7
1,872.0
2,004.5
5.7
7.1
Liabilities
3,098.4
3,502.7
3,537.6
13.1
1.0
of which:
to banks
599.3
640.5
641.7
6.9
0.2
Trade payables
414.7
480.9
470.4
16.0
− 2.2
to affiliated companies
1,322.5
1,513.1
1,518.7
14.4
0.4
Advance payments received on account of orders
349.7
424.3
474.9
21.3
11.9
Provisions
908.8
1,031.9
1,048.3
13.5
1.6
of which:
Provisions for pensions
317.6
370.3
374.9
16.6
1.2
Deferred income
66.4
69.9
76.3
5.3
9.1
Liabilities and provisions
4,073.5
4,604.5
4,662.2
13.0
1.3
Total capital3
5,844.2
6,476.5
6,666.7
10.8
2.9
Memo items:
Sales
7,246.7
8,818.6
8,836.8
21.7
0.2
Sales as a percentage of total assets
124.0
136.2
132.6
.
.
* Extrapolated results; differences in the figures due to rounding. 1 Excluding goodwill. 2 Including shares in affiliated companies and goodwill. 3 Less adjustments to equity.
Table 3.4: Enterprises’ balance sheet ratios*
Item
2021
2022
2023s
As a percentage of total assets1
Intangible fixed assets2
1.4
1.3
1.3
Tangible fixed assets
22.4
21.3
21.8
Inventories
15.9
17.7
18.0
Short-term receivables
29.1
30.0
28.6
Long-term equity and liabilities3
50.2
47.9
48.5
of which:
Equity1
30.3
28.9
30.1
Long-term liabilities
14.5
13.2
12.8
Short-term liabilities
38.5
40.8
40.3
As a percentage of tangible fixed assets4
Equity1
127.1
128.2
130.3
Long-term equity and liabilities3
210.7
212.4
210.1
As a percentage of fixed assets5
Long-term equity and liabilities3
111.7
111.7
109.9
As a percentage of short-term liabilities
Cash resources6 and short-term receivables
99.8
95.2
92.4
As a percentage of liabilities and provisions7
Cash flow8
17.2
15.7
15.3
* Extrapolated results; differences in the figures due to rounding. 1 Less adjustments to equity. 2 Excluding goodwill. 3 Equity, provisions for pensions, long-term liabilities and the special tax-allowable reserve. 4 Including intangible fixed assets (excluding goodwill). 5 Tangible fixed assets, intangible fixed assets, other long-term equity investments, long-term receivables and long-term securities. 6 Cash and short-term securities.7 Liabilities, provisions, deferred income and proportionate special tax-allowable reserve less cash. 8Annual result, depreciation, and changes in provisions, in the special tax-allowable reserve and in prepaid expenses and deferred income.
Supplementary information
Profitability and financial position of German listed groups in 2023 and an outlook for 2024
German listed groups’ revenue fell by 8 % in 2023, following strong growth in the two preceding years. 1 Operating income before (EBITDA) and after (EBIT) depreciation and amortisation stagnated. As a result, the profit margin increased by 0.7 percentage point to 7.6 %. 2 It is thus above its mean since 2007 of 6.6 %.
The increase seen in groups’ profit margin is not broad based. The profit margin rose, especially in the case of large energy groups. Measured in terms of EBIT, their earnings situation in 2022 was still considerably affected by the additional costs of purchases to make up for the absence of commodity supplies from Russia and unfavourable valuation effects of derivatives for hedging against commodity price risks. These burdens ceased to exist in 2023, meaning that energy groups improved their profits significantly despite a decline in revenue. Excluding energy groups, the profit margin in the production sector fell by 1 percentage point to 7.6 %. The chemical industry, in particular, suffered from energy prices that were still higher than in 2019. These prices weighed on their competitiveness and it is likely that relocations of production abroad took place. Moreover, impairments were necessary due to higher capital costs and deteriorating business prospects. The profit margin in the services sector fell by 1 percentage point to 10.1 %. This was chiefly attributable to the drop in the profit margin seen in the logistics sector when taking the exceptionally high level in 2022 as a starting point. Average freight rates fell in 2023 as a result of weak demand and the normalisation of supply chains, which had a detrimental effect on the profitability of the logistics sector. The profit margin of groups in the rest of the services sector did not improve either.
Revenue, earnings and profit margin of German non-financial groups
The balance sheet saw groups’ assets contract by 3 % in 2023. This was mainly due to the significant loss in the value of energy groups’ derivative assets. Lower commodity prices had an impact here. As a result, long-term assets fell by 1 % and short-term assets by 7 % in the reporting sample. In the case of the latter, the exceptionally high profit distribution of one single logistics group was another factor behind this development.
On the financing side, equity was up slightly by 1 % in 2023. The retention of profits played a key role in this context. High spending on pension provisions and currency translation differences had a negative impact. Buy-backs also weighed on equity. Debt fell by 5 %, mainly due to the valuation of energy groups’ derivatives positions, as was the case for assets. Overall, the leverage ratio declined, and the capital ratio increased by 1.5 percentage point to 34.5 %. In the production sector, it rose from 32.2 % to 33.9 %. The ratio grew more moderately in the services sector, rising 0.4 percentage point to 36.6 %. The lower capital ratio of the production sector compared with the services sector was once again attributable to automobile manufacturers’ financing business in 2023. In some cases, this has a major impact on the financial structure at group level. Excluding the segments in automobile groups with a focus on financial services business, the capital ratio of the production sector increased from 36.8 % to 39.8 % in 2023.
For 2024, there appears to be a moderate decline in revenue and a significant drop in pre-tax profits according to groups’ interim financial statements that are currently available and have been evaluated. Groups’ profit margin is likely to decline somewhat as a result. This probably partly reflects the current earnings trends of domestic companies in the corporate financial statements statistics. 3 Viewed at the sector level of groups in the year to date, the picture that emerges is mixed. The services sector has increased its revenue and profits slightly. In the production sector, by contrast, automobile manufacturers, in particular, have recorded a decrease in revenue and strong earnings declines due to a weakness in sales as well as restructuring and transformation expenses. In addition, falling electricity and gas prices have led to a decline in energy groups’ revenue, while their pre-tax profits have not reached the high level achieved in the previous year.
6 Conclusion
Despite the weak development of the economy and higher financing costs, non-financial corporations performed well in 2023 in terms of their earnings and financing conditions. Energy-intensive enterprises continued to be negatively affected, probably in connection with the rise in energy prices, which worsened their competitive position. However, the corporate sector as a whole was able to increase its profitability compared to the previous year despite higher interest and personnel expenses. The fact that enterprises are offsetting lost revenue with cost savings also played a role, as sales growth was weak in 2023, and inflation remained high.
Stability metrics also improved. In addition to the gross profit margin and the capital base, enterprises’ liquidity levels was also very good and long-term liabilities continued to fall.
2024 will be another challenging year for enterprises. The ongoing economic weakness is likely to weigh on enterprises’ business activity and thus their sales growth in 2024. At the same time, the pressure on costs is expected to remain high due to persistently high financing and energy costs, as well as the sharp rise in wages. These pressures can also be seen in the increased number of corporate insolvencies, which are expected to exceed pre-pandemic levels again for the first time in 2024. On the one hand, cyclical stress factors are creating headwinds for enterprises. On the other, German firms are facing structural challenges posed by a shortage of skilled workers due to demographic factors, the green and digital transition of the economy, and the changed global economic environment. On balance, this is likely to weigh on profitability in some parts of the corporate sector, such as the manufacturing industry, and dampen profitability in the corporate sector as a whole in 2024.
Long series of extrapolated results of the corporate financial statement statistics are available online at www.bundesbank.de.
List of references
Acemoglu, D. (2024), The Simple Macroeconomics of AI, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No 32487.
Acharya, V.V., M. Crosignani, T. Eisert and S. Steffen (2022), Zombie Lending: Theoretical, International, and Historical Perspectives, Annual Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 21–38.
Aghion, P. and S. Bunel (2024), AI and Growth: Where Do We Stand, London School of Economics, Mimeo.
Albuquerque, B. und R. Iyer (2023), The Rise of the Walking Dead: Zombie Firms Around the World, IMF Working Paper, June 2023.
Alder, M., N. Coimbra and U. Szczerbowicz (2024), Corporate Debt Structure and Heterogeneous Monetary Policy Transmission, CEPR Discussion Paper, No 18787.
Andrews, D., and F. Petroulakis (2019), Breaking the shackles, Zombie firms, weak banks and depressed restructuring in Europe, European Central Bank, Working Paper Series, No 2240.
Becker, T., E. Biewen, D. Hüwel, and S. Schultz (2024), Individual Financial Statements of Non-Financial Firms (JANIS), Data Report 2024‑09 – Metadata Version JANIS Data-Docv-13, Deutsche Bundesbank, Research Data and Service Centre.
Becker, T., E. Biewen, D. Hüwel, and S. Schultz (2022), Corporate Balance Sheets (Ustan) 1964–1986, Data Report 2022‑18 – Metadata Version 1, Deutsche Bundesbank, Research Data and Service Centre.
Becker, T., E. Biewen, S. Schultz, and M. Weisbecker (2020), Corporate Balance Sheets (Ustan) 1987–2019, Data Report 2020‑08 – Metadata Version 4, Deutsche Bundesbank, Research Data and Service Centre.
Bick, A., A. Blandin and D. J. Deming (2024), The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI,NBER Working Paper, No 32966.
Bighelli, T., T. Lalinsky, and J. Vanhala (2022), Covid-19 pandemic, state aid and firm productivity, Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers, No 1/2022.
Bittner, C., F. Fecht and C. Georg (2021) Contagious Zombies, Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper No 15/2021.
Briggs, J. and D. Kodnani (2023), The Potentially Large Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Economic Growth, Goldman Sachs Economics Research.
Caballero, R. J., T. Hoshi, and A. K. Kashyap (2008), Zombie Lending and Depressed Restructuring in Japan, American Economic Review Vol 98(5), pp. 1943–77.
Cœuré, B. (2021), What 3.5 million French firms can tell us about the efficiency of Covid-19 support measures.
De Jonghe, O., Mulier, K. and Samarin, I. (2024), Counting the undead: A new metric for identifying zombie firms.
Dell'Acqua, F., E. McFowland III, E. R. Mollick, H. Lifshitz-Assaf, K. Kellogg, S. Rajendran, L. Krayer, F. Candelon and K. R. Lakhani (2023), Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality, Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Management Unit Working Paper, No 24‑013.
Deutsche Bundesbank (2023), The impact of digitalisation on labour productivity growth, Monthly Report, March 2023, pp. 43‑65.
Deutsche Bundesbank (2021a), Corporate insolvencies in Germany during the coronavirus crisis, Monthly Report, December 2021, pp. 47– 49.
Deutsche Bundesbank (2021b). The impact of monetary policy depending on the debt situation in the non-financial private sector: Evidence for the euro area, Monthly Report, April 2021, pp. 15–33.
Deutsche Bundesbank (2021c), Assessments and expectations of firms in the pandemic: findings from the Bundesbank Online Panel Firms, Monthly Report, April 2021, pp. 33ff.
Deutsche Bundesbank (2020): German enterprises’ profitability and financing in 2019, Box – Updated assessment of the development of zombie firms in Germany, Monthly Report, December 2020, p. 68‑70.
Deutsche Bundesbank (2017): German enterprises’ profitability and financing in 2016, Box – The emergence of zombie firms in Germany in the low-interest-rate environment, Monthly Report, December 2017, pp. 37‑40.
Eloundou T., S. Manning, P. Mishkin and D. Rock (2023), GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models.
Favara, G., C. Minoiu and A. Perez-Orive, (2021), U.S. Zombie firms: How many and how consequential? FEDS Notes, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (2022), Informationen zu Corona-Hilfen des Bundes.
Federal Statistical Office (2024), Rechtliche Einheiten mit Nutzung von Technologien der künstlichen Intelligenz (KI) nach Beschäftigtengrößenklassen.
Jordà, Ò. (2005), Estimation and Inference of Impulse Responses by Local Projections, American Economic Review, Vol. 95 (1), pp. 161–182.
Kerkhof, A., T. Licht, M. Menkhoff and K. Wohlrabe (2024), Die Nutzung von Künstlicher Intelligenz in der deutschen Wirtschaft, ifo Schnelldienst, Vol. 77 (08), pp. 39–43.
Kilian, L., and H. Lütkepohl (2017), Structural Vector Autoregressive Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
Kurt, E., Asymmetric effects of monetary policy on firms, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking (forthcoming).
Lane, M., M. Williams and S. Broecke (2023), The impact of AI on the workplace: Main findings from the OECDAI surveys of employers and workers. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No 288.
McGowan, M., D. Andrews and V. Millot (2018), The walking dead? Zombie firms and productivity performance in OECD countries, Economic Policy, Vol. 33, pp. 685–736.
Noy, S. and W. Zhang (2023), Experimental Evidence on the Productivity Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence, Science, Vol. 381 (6654), pp. 187–192.
Pelosi, M., G. Rodano and E. Sette, (2021), Zombie firms and the take-up of support measures during Covid-19, Banca d’Italia Occasional Paper, No 650.
Peng, S., E. Kalliamvakou, P. Cihon and M. Demirer (2023), The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot.
Pérez-Orive, A., and Y. Timmer (2023), Distressed Firms and the Large Effects of Monetary Policy Tightenings FEDS Notes, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Schaller, D., K. Wohlrabe and A. Wolf (2023), KI, Cloud Computing und Blockchain – wo steht die deutsche Wirtschaft?, ifo Schnelldienst, 2023, Vol. 8 2023, pp. 3–9.